Policy and law · Brief

England's High Court rules a trained image model is not a copy of its training pictures

Getty Images loses its remaining copyright claim against Stability AI in the first full UK trial over building an AI model.

4 November 2025 · 1 min read

An empty wood-panelled courtroom with tall windows and dust in the light

Picture made for ABURA Bureau.

On 4 November 2025 Mrs Justice Joanna Smith handed down judgment in Getty Images v Stability AI, the first full trial in England over using copyright works to build an AI model.

The case had narrowed before the end. Getty accepted that there was no evidence the training took place in the United Kingdom, so the question of whether training here infringes was not decided. It did not argue that the model stores copies of its images. Its remaining claim was that the model, once brought into the UK, was itself an infringing copy. The court disagreed: where an AI model itself is not an infringing copy, it falls outside the rule Getty relied on. Getty won only narrow trade mark points on early versions that reproduced its watermark.

The ruling leaves the central UK question open. It also shows where the value of training data sits. Once a model is trained, the pictures are not inside it to be reclaimed. An owner's strongest position comes before training, at the point of access, under a licence agreed in advance.

Find out what your data could be worth

Tell us what kinds of data your company holds. Buyers set the price, and you keep the data.

Start on abura.io

Get the weekly issue

One email a week once the issue starts, only the desks you pick. Leave whenever you like.

Your desks

We use your email only to send the issue. Your rights.

More from Policy and law

An empty courtroom at dusk, a wooden judge's gavel resting on a stack of thin glowing glass data tablets on the benchPolicy and law
Policy and law · Brief

A US appeals court says the market for AI training data is real

The first federal appeals ruling on AI training and fair use treats licensing data for training as a market an owner can lose.

31 October 2026 · 1 min read
A long supermarket aisle at night, the electronic price labels along the shelves glowing and each showing a different blank price displayPolicy and law
Policy and law · Brief

US regulator asks nine companies how personal data sets their prices and pay

The Federal Trade Commission wants to know whether what companies know about you changes what you pay, and what gig workers earn.

31 October 2026 · 1 min read
A crowd seen from high above as small frosted-glass figures on a dark plaza, a thin horizontal scanning beam of light passing over them, every figure anonymous and blurredPolicy and law
Policy and law · Explainer

Taking personal data out before a sale

AI buyers want what your data shows about the work, not about people. Here is what taking personal data out really means.

19 October 2026 · 2 min read